Polarisk

Sector · Facilities management

Health surveillance for facilities management

Facilities management has an unusual surveillance problem: the employer rarely has its workforce in one place, or even on its own premises. The exposures are real and mostly straightforward, but nobody ever sees the whole population at once, which is exactly what a surveillance cycle assumes.

What you owe

The programmes this work triggers

Programmes this work commonly triggers
ProgrammeUsually triggered byWho tends to be in scope
Skin and dermatitisCleaning chemicals, sanitisers, wet work, occlusive glovesCleaning teams, washroom services, kitchen and catering support
Night-worker assessmentOut-of-hours cleaning, security, overnight maintenance windowsCleaning crews, security officers, on-call maintenance
RespiratoryCleaning chemical aerosols, dusts during works, some biocidesCleaning teams, maintenance during refurbishment or planned works
Safety-critical medicalsWork at height, plant rooms, confined spaces, driving between sitesMaintenance engineers, mobile technicians, lone workers
Audiometry and hearingPlant rooms, workshops, grounds maintenance equipmentMaintenance engineers, grounds teams
Hand-arm vibrationGrounds equipment, power tools, some maintenance workGrounds maintenance, mobile engineers

Indicative, not a substitute for your own risk assessment. What you actually owe follows from your measured exposures and your rostering. The surveillance check gives an estimate in about two minutes.

The blind spots

Who gets missed

Surveillance populations are usually built from an obvious list of shop-floor roles. These are the people who fall off it.

  • Cleaning staff on client sitesThe largest population, the highest dermatitis risk, and the least visible to the employer. Frequently part-time, often working outside core hours, and rarely present at anything organised centrally.
  • Mobile engineersDriving between sites all day, working at height and in plant rooms, and never in one place long enough to attend a clinic. Both a safety-critical and a driving-for-work population.
  • Lone and out-of-hours workersOften meet the night-worker definition and are the hardest group to reach with anything requiring attendance.
  • TUPE-transferred staffArrive with an exposure history that is somebody else's records, frequently incomplete, and with no baseline that the new employer holds.

Where it fails

The failure mode in this sector

FM fails on reach. Everything else about the surveillance is manageable, since the exposures are well understood and the assessments are mostly questionnaire-led, but the delivery model assumes you can gather people, and this sector cannot. Any process requiring attendance at a place and time will reach the office-based staff and miss the cleaners, which inverts the risk.

The second problem is inheritance. Contracts change hands and staff transfer with them, arriving with an exposure history held by a previous employer in a form nobody can use. Without a baseline of their own, the new employer is carrying an undocumented liability for exposure it did not cause and cannot evidence.

Why device-based assessment changes this sector specifically. A worker answering on their own phone, on their own shift, at a client site, is the only delivery model that reaches an FM workforce. It is also why coverage in FM can go from poor to near-complete without adding a single clinic day.

See all six programmes →

Questions

Common questions

Our staff work on client premises. Whose duty is the surveillance?

Yours, as their employer, in respect of their exposures at work. The client has its own duties for people on its premises, and both can apply at once. What does not happen is the duty transferring to the client because the work is done there.

How do we reach part-time cleaning staff who are never in the office?

By not requiring them to be. Each worker gets their own single-use link and answers on their own device, in their own time. That converts the population that is hardest to reach under a clinic model into the one that completes fastest, because completion no longer depends on attendance.

What do we do about staff who TUPE across with no records?

Establish your own baseline promptly. You cannot inherit what was never documented, and continuing to expose someone with no baseline leaves you unable to show whether any later condition arose on your watch. A questionnaire-led baseline at transfer is quick, and it is the point from which your own record starts.

Start here

See what your sites actually owe

Four questions about your workforce and its exposures, and an estimate of the assessments owed each year by programme. No sign-up, no personal data.